ABSTRACT
Introduction Group A Streptococcus (GAS) causes mild diseases, and unfrequently invasive infections (iGAS). Following the December 2022 alert from the United Kingdom regarding the unusual increase in GAS and iGAS infections, we analyzed the incidence of GAS infections in 2018–2022 in our hospital. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients seen in a pediatric emergency department (ED) diagnosed with streptococcal pharyngitis and scarlet fever and patients admitted for iGAS during last 5 years. Results The incidence of GAS infections was 6.43 and 12.38/1000 ED visits in 2018 and 2019, respectively. During the COVID-19 pandemic the figures were 5.33 and 2.14/1000 ED visits in 2020 and 2021, respectively, and increased to 10.2/1000 ED visits in 2022. The differences observed were not statistically significant (p=0.352). Conclusions In our series, as in other countries, GAS infections decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and mild and severe cases increased considerably in 2022, but did not reach similar levels to those detected in other countries. Resumen Introducción Streptococcus del grupo A (GAS) causa infecciones leves y ocasionalmente invasivas (iGAS). Tras la alerta publicada en diciembre de 2022 en el Reino Unido respecto al aumento de infecciones por GAS leves e iGAS, analizamos la incidencia de estas infecciones en 2018-2022 en nuestro hospital. Métodos Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de los niños atendidos en urgencias pediátricas (UP) diagnosticados de faringitis estreptocócica y escarlatina y los ingresados por iGAS durante 5 años. Resultados La incidencia de infecciones por GAS fue de 6,43 y de 12,38/1.000 visitas a UP en 2018 y 2019, respectivamente. Durante la pandemia fue de 5,33 y de 2,14/1.000 visitas en 2020 y 2021, respectivamente, y aumentó a 10,2/1.000 visitas en 2022. Estas diferencias no fueron estadísticamente significativas (p=0,352). Discusión En nuestra serie, al igual que en otros países, las infecciones por GAS disminuyeron durante la pandemia de COVID-19, pero en 2022 aumentaron considerablemente los casos leves y graves, sin alcanzar cifras similares a las detectadas en otros países.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of oral saliva swab (OSS) reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) compared with RT-PCR and antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) on nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) for SARS-CoV-2 in children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicentre diagnostic study. SETTING: Study nested in a prospective, observational cohort (EPICO-AEP) performed between February and March 2021 including 10 hospitals in Spain. PATIENTS: Children from 0 to 18 years with symptoms compatible with Covid-19 of ≤5 days of duration were included. Two NPS samples (Ag-RDT and RT-PCR) and one OSS sample for RT-PCR were collected. MAIN OUTCOME: Performance of Ag-RDT and RT-PCR on NPS and RT-PCR on OSS sample for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: 1174 children were included, aged 3.8 years (IQR 1.7-9.0); 73/1174 (6.2%) patients tested positive by at least one of the techniques. Sensitivity and specificity of OSS RT-PCR were 72.1% (95% CI 59.7 to 81.9) and 99.6% (95% CI 99 to 99.9), respectively, versus 61.8% (95% CI 49.1 to 73) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.4 to 100) for the Ag-RDT. Kappa index was 0.79 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.88) for OSS RT-PCR and 0.74 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.84) for Ag-RDT versus NPS RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: RT-PCR on the OSS sample is an accurate option for SARS-CoV-2 testing in children. A less intrusive technique for younger patients, who usually are tested frequently, might increase the number of patients tested.